PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Are "psi-pets" living things?
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
| Are "psi-pets" living things? | |||||||
| Author | Message | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posted on Tue May 30, 2006 5:05 am | |||||||
psi_manipulator_3000
Joined: 14 Jan 2006 |
If it is indeed a ball of conciousness, then I would consider it alive. Computers can't do that yeah, just programs s'pose. They can still turn on you though, apparentely in the future. I even had this guy turn up at an assembly once in my school couple years ago who warned us that computers were going to take over hehe. |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Tue May 30, 2006 7:35 am | |||||||
Archamond
Joined: 08 May 2006 |
You just need to say something oposite than me, right? |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:13 am | |||||||
paraplayer
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 |
There have been scientific tests that insects have emotions?
What? Why would an ant have emotions? They don't need them. What is your source? |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:17 am | |||||||
Alexandra
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 |
I don't remember someone saying that they have emotions. Why wouldn't they need them? We need 'em just as much as they do... |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:12 pm | |||||||
Archamond
Joined: 08 May 2006 |
Cos they are non-conscious beings |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:49 pm | |||||||
Alexandra
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 |
Who says so? We all started that way! | ||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:54 pm | |||||||
Archamond
Joined: 08 May 2006 |
Yeah, few milions years ago:P Thats their problem that they remained low in evolution: PS.Why you love ants so much |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:33 pm | |||||||
Alexandra
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 |
I hate insects except butterfly's... ants are ok... better than spiders and whatelse DX
Yeah so? maybe the ants have a use underground with an enormous army and ants over 5 meters big and stuff and they're going to take over because they're smarter... You can't know, and I can because I'm their fanclub! yyyeeeahhhh... riiiight... maybee pieple are right tat I have a uge imaginasion and R crasy XD |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:08 pm | |||||||
Archamond
Joined: 08 May 2006 |
Spiders are cool Maybe they have underground, who knows |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:31 pm | |||||||
paraplayer
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 |
This is what I was talking about. I'm assuming he meant emotions by feelings but I could be wrong. |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:48 pm | |||||||
phsythax
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 |
thats the paradox-ish think about programming, programming is basicly "telling a microship what to do" say calculate 3 + 3 and it will do it. without saying "ill do it but hand over that extra ramslot first, im feeling tired" and whys that? becourse again, its programmed to do whatever we tell it to do Can we tell it to think for itself? First, we must teach it what "teach for itself" means, that itself is a very hard task. Second we must make some kind of system that tells the computer how to "feel" what mood it should be in. Then we can start teaching it how to talk and what Evil is etc etc.. |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Sat Jun 03, 2006 4:10 pm | |||||||
ENtoMT
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 |
hmmm well psipets are not living. They are artifical Life, if some one programd one to have a mind of its own and every single thing That a human can do then it would still be artifical life. if it had organs, a brain then it would be living. | ||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:11 pm | |||||||
Jake
Joined: 31 May 2006 |
Has anyone seen the episode of Star-Trek, where Data wants to resign, but can't because Starfleet does not yet deem him living? In the end they deem him to indeed be alive. And in it they define living as:
1. Sentience 2. Intelligence 3. Free will I don't know anything about Psi-Pets but if they fulfill those three requirements, I would say that yes, they are living beings. (For non-trekkies, data is an android, a robot, if you will, that has human characteristics.) |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:28 am | |||||||
Lucidess
Joined: 20 Apr 2006 |
I've just started to undergo the classic psi-clone idea, and I will post whatever in my blog as I get it goin. So far i've made blueprints for the body, and wrote down alot of properties and such for the mind and body |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
| Posted on Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:23 pm | |||||||
LOTRfool
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 |
That's because they don't deem him sentient. I'm a trekky, and he was subjected to be dismantled and rebuilt and to see how his positronic brain was built to build more. It was a question of sentience, not livelyhood. I stick with my stand that psipets are not living. |
||||||
| Back to top | |||||||
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Are "psi-pets" living things?
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.