PsiPog.net

Science is EvolvingHomeArticlesQ&AArchiveMediaLinksSearch

View topic - "Smoke"?

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » "Smoke"?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

"Smoke"?
Author Message
Posted on Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:37 pm

McLoud

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 56

Very nice posts. Good to know more ppl can see them. I was a bit worried about the idea of using negative energy, sound like it is... well, negative. But I dont think anything when doing it (I'm pretty good at it due to a specific "exercise" I've doing across 2 years), so I don't feel it positive or negative. I don't feel anything at all sometimes, others just the warm energy emerging from my hands, sometimes just a kind of pression inside my forehead. One day I managed to spread the pression across my head almost to the back, and with that almost lifted a plastic coup in the air. I still need pratice, but I'm very confident that's indeed possible.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:37 pm

wannabepker

Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 71

I dont like the terms of negative energy and positive energy you guys have. This thread seemed to get very fluffy very quickly.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:03 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

Has anyone stopped to consider that the waves you see are from eye fatigue or some other physical phenomenon that is in no way psionic? I see waves....but I can't see psi. I see auras around things when I stare at them....but I don't believe auras exist.

In addition, there is nothing to suggest that psi reflects light in a manner that would allow it to be visible by the naked eye. Don't say that flaring is evidence because flaring is when a construct emits light, not reflect it.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:48 pm

Xiouslaidyn

Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 194

Roy wrote:
Has anyone stopped to consider that the waves you see are from eye fatigue or some other physical phenomenon that is in no way psionic? I see waves....but I can't see psi. I see auras around things when I stare at them....but I don't believe auras exist.

In addition, there is nothing to suggest that psi reflects light in a manner that would allow it to be visible by the naked eye. Don't say that flaring is evidence because flaring is when a construct emits light, not reflect it.


http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~sai/energ.html

That link contains a history of auras, or "energy fields" as they are known by modern science. It has enough keywords for you to further exend a research into the FACT that the human energy field(s) do indeed exist.

The aura and the energy field are one and the same, Roy, and your claim of not believing in either is bred of complete ignorance. You are wrong. Science has proven that you are wrong.

In time, not much time either, you will see proof that everything is permeated in positve, negative, and neutral magnets, which are subatomic in size, perhaps a little bigger, and are a result of the electromagnetic grid that blankets this entire planet. Perhaps they ARE the electromagnetic grid, but I can only speculate at this point.

So, take my offer of proof and think whatever you like of it, but someday you will have to eat your ignorant words, like it or not... better stock up on some ketchup.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:48 pm

Jesterbird

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

I can see something like that when I sort of... look at air. It's like that wavy stuff you see over pavement. I first saw it while staring at the carpet, after I had been trying to see auras. I've been searching the internet to find an (non-psionics) explanation for it, but I haven't had any luck.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:49 pm

Xiouslaidyn

Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 194

wannabepker wrote:
I dont like the terms of negative energy and positive energy you guys have. This thread seemed to get very fluffy very quickly.


You don't like the terms of negative energy and positive energy? That's fluffy? I guess protons and electrons are all a bunch of fluff too eh? And the existence of the atom, I guess that's fluff?

I hate the word fluff.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:58 pm

Mordak

Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 33

Is it me or Roy's post is absolutely not clear. I will try an answer anyway.
I can see waves anytime of the day just by focusing on it. When I do telekinesis they are involved ; they correlate with the movement of the object. They are physical and definitely not only related to psychokinesis.

I don't know what you are refering to as psi. It's not a scientific term. I suppose it refers to energy. But everything is energy so it dosen't seem's a very specific and well shared concept. Colors are seen because of light reflection. If i see white waves, light as to do with it. If you don't think naked eyes can see such waves, well I don't care. Wink

If flaring is when construct emit light, I learned something, thanks. But it as nothing to do with what I think is electromagnetic waves.

Mordak
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:23 pm

wannabepker

Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 71

Xiouslaidyn wrote:
wannabepker wrote:
I dont like the terms of negative energy and positive energy you guys have. This thread seemed to get very fluffy very quickly.


You don't like the terms of negative energy and positive energy? That's fluffy? I guess protons and electrons are all a bunch of fluff too eh? And the existence of the atom, I guess that's fluff?

I hate the word fluff.



"Fluffbunny: A Moron in serious need of a clue, especially when clues are readily available; A moron studying hard to become an idiot, but failing the course"

Fluff being the poop of fluffbunnies.

You think you can see positive and negative energy? if that were so, you would be blinded just by looking at your computer.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:32 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

Xiouslaidyn wrote:
Roy wrote:
Has anyone stopped to consider that the waves you see are from eye fatigue or some other physical phenomenon that is in no way psionic? I see waves....but I can't see psi. I see auras around things when I stare at them....but I don't believe auras exist.

In addition, there is nothing to suggest that psi reflects light in a manner that would allow it to be visible by the naked eye. Don't say that flaring is evidence because flaring is when a construct emits light, not reflect it.


http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~sai/energ.html

That link contains a history of auras, or "energy fields" as they are known by modern science. It has enough keywords for you to further exend a research into the FACT that the human energy field(s) do indeed exist.

The aura and the energy field are one and the same, Roy, and your claim of not believing in either is bred of complete ignorance. You are wrong. Science has proven that you are wrong.

In time, not much time either, you will see proof that everything is permeated in positve, negative, and neutral magnets, which are subatomic in size, perhaps a little bigger, and are a result of the electromagnetic grid that blankets this entire planet. Perhaps they ARE the electromagnetic grid, but I can only speculate at this point.

So, take my offer of proof and think whatever you like of it, but someday you will have to eat your ignorant words, like it or not... better stock up on some ketchup.


You may think an aura and a human energy field are the same thing, but I do not because of the spiritual connotations surrounding the term "aura". I'd like for you to show me some research that show that this energy field reflects light and in this manner it is viewable by the human eye.

You can make yourself seem very intelligent and feel better about yourself by labeling me as ignorant all you want. I'd rather not blindly believe everything I read and justify it with fluke science and then laud it over others in a feeble attempt to present myself as knowing what others are too "ignorant" to know.

As you always do, you describe everything in the most general terms as possible without providing any sort of clarification of what you're talking about. And your claim of "it's only a matter of time before science discovers what I already know" is real weak sauce.

So if you think I should stock up on ketchup, then you should stock up on mouthwash, because pretty much everything you say is bullshit.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:06 pm

pepsiboy

Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 562

lets just wait til 2012.. then we can argue..
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:11 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

pepsiboy wrote:
lets just wait til 2012.. then we can argue..


Is this how you're wasting your post limit, pepsiboy? Making a one sentence statement out of context and without any explanation? This is why we have the post limit rule.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:01 pm

pepsiboy

Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 562

Roy wrote:
pepsiboy wrote:
lets just wait til 2012.. then we can argue..


Is this how you're wasting your post limit, pepsiboy? Making a one sentence statement out of context and without any explanation? This is why we have the post limit rule.


this is why I have a post limit rule, and you dont. keep it real kid.
Back to top
Posted on Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:06 pm

wannabepker

Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 71

uh.. no pepsiboy has a good point. lets just wait till 2012 when we actually know whats going on.
Back to top
Posted on Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:37 pm

McLoud

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 56

Whats gonna happen in 2012? My future prediction skills aren't that great (eg: they dont work as I want), so anyone care to clarify?
Back to top
Posted on Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:22 pm

Lasher

Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 64

2012 is supposedly when the world will end or some cataclysm happens on/to Earth that the Mayan Calendar predicts.
Back to top

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » "Smoke"?