PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Something i thought of
| Something i thought of | |||
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Posted on Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:52 am | |||
genjo
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 |
yeah i second that. besides, if we dont have answers, then why are we going on and on. this is all subjective at the mo' |
||
| Back to top | |||
| Posted on Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:59 pm | |||
freakinrican626
Joined: 23 Apr 2006 |
it was not what you were proving that bothered me. it was how you were proving it. if you read in other posts, i plainly said that i believed that psiballs obeyed the laws of physics.
categorical syllogism may be something scientists use to solve theorems and what not, but since we know hardly anything about psiballs i do not feel using categorical syllogism an appropriate thing to use to prove the theory. no i do not mind language at all. it is a necessary tool of communication. language just has some limitations that can be seen most clearly through categorical syllogism. i wrote a paper on language and zen and i talked about language's limitations. since that was a while back i cannot recall the exact terms for the limitations presented in categorical syllogism, but i dont think it would be that hard to research on your own either. if i happen to find my paper ill tell you what those limitations are. you misread my post, particially because i was kind of heated and could not articulate myself as best as i wanted to. |
||
| Back to top | |||
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Constructs » Something i thought of
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.