PsiPog.net

Science is EvolvingHomeArticlesQ&AArchiveMediaLinksSearch

View topic - born psi?

PsiPog.net Forum Index » General Discussion » born psi?

Goto page 1, 2  Next

born psi?
Poll: Born psion?
born
37%
37% [ 15 ]
partial
32%
32% [ 13 ]
non
30%
30% [ 12 ]
Total Votes : 40
Author Message
born psi? on Sat May 06, 2006 2:00 pm

freakinrican626

Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 514

so who was born w/ a decent amount of psi capabilites?
i'm partial. i bet there are probably some developed non's here, but i wanna know where are psions mostly coming from


EDIT: oops. i forgot to add an option for the poll for developed non's.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 2:02 pm

pyroman098

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 916

i was born with psi capabilities...
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 3:25 pm

psi_manipulator_3000

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1274

I'm not really sure.How can you tell. I mean I have a nack for moving psi around my body and I have (from what I have read) managed to affect the psiwheel pretty fast compared to other people, but I have also started this at 14. How would I know if I were born with it? I probably wasn't, but I was always interested, deep down. I even tried moving stuff with telekinesis when I was young, but never moved anything. Not sure. I would probably go with developed quickly.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 3:29 pm

Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

nah. I started out completely new.

PS: i added a non part in the poll for you.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 3:45 pm

genjo

Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 222

hereditary.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 4:01 pm

Lucidess

Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 837

The 3 terms I had in my head to determine someone is either:
Radical: cannot control psionics very well but they have alot of it. (someone who sees 'spirits' as a child for example)
Natural: can control it well. (Can create the first psiball in 5 minutes)
Non: not as gifted. (seem to struggle with psi, however we can be all equal given the input of hard work and determination.)
Everyone is born with the ability to control psi, the characteristics just vary from person to person.
None of my family members have shown me any sort of psionic energies whatsoever, however I believe I am born with it. Or within the terms I say, Natural.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 4:25 pm

neveza

Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1147

I hate these types of polls.

Every human is born with psi. Every human has the ability to manipulate psi (unless dead or braindead).

The thread\poll deserves much of edited for the mild misleading information.

(END OF TROLLING)
I found out about psionics about 6 years of age, practice sesitivity.

then, Psiballs...which I stopped because it made me feel weird and I didn't enjoy it.

then Psychokinesis of the body (DMILS).

eventually, over the years. I progress in knowledge through Psipog.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 5:22 pm

Aether

Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 60

I had active abilities from the moment time I could speak... basically telepathy / rare moments of precognition. Erm, 'poltergeist' stuff too.

Parents are 'psi-active'. But was never called "psi"... it just was, only became apparent later on others didn't really have the same shit happen. Instinctive and mostly uncontrolled.

I suppose, broadly, that would make me a "born/born-on/natural". [ ? ]

Aether.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 5:23 pm

sgtpsion

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 425

While it IS true that all humans are born with the capacity to manipulate Psi, it's also true that some people have an easier time manipulating it. These people are known as "borns" or "born-ons".

There is also a third group, who have an easier time than most, but not as easy a time as the "borns". These people are known as the "partials".

So, we're not really putting down the "nons" ("non" being a term that is used for lack of a better one, and describes the majority of people. I take it to mean "non-affinite", meaning "one without a particular affinity".), we're just trying to get a basic idea of how many people are Borns, how many are Partials, and how many are just Nons with "m4d sk1llz".

(I know, I'm a loser. Don't judge me for it!)
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 5:44 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

This born-on, partial, non stuff is psion guild theory. Many people have their doubts about this sort of classification due to a lack of empirical evidence, though, I do believe that everyone can agree that some develop a proficiency in psionics naturally, while the majority have to do so through diligent practice.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 8:55 pm

freakinrican626

Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 514

Roy wrote:
This born-on, partial, non stuff is psion guild theory. Many people have their doubts about this sort of classification due to a lack of empirical evidence, though, I do believe that everyone can agree that some develop a proficiency in psionics naturally, while the majority have to do so through diligent practice.



ya thats definitely where i got it granted. let me explain my self first (i have noticed that this site sort of considers psion guild to be a taboo kind of thing), this past month i have had no interaction w/ psions, let alone w/ psions on the net, so i admit i'm a little naive on where i should get my info from. but i decided i would just check it out and formulate my own opinion. the only page i've actually looked at is the definition page.

there were concepts that i hadn't attached words to and some were interesting. i dont know what else they have on the site though. so if they have like fighting things im sorry for mentioning the site and i'll just stop talking about it.



oh and thanks for the add apollo
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 9:55 pm

ShadowWolfX

Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 507

Umm, I suppose I was a born psi user. I've had telepathic and other happenings to me since early childhood also both of my parents have been said to be psions, so I guess that qualifies me as a born one? Also i've had all "natural" starts in each field of psionics, though I still must work on them to get better like everyone else, so I guess I may fall into partial or born, but I voted for born.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 10:11 pm

Roy

Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 416

freakinrican626 wrote:
Roy wrote:
This born-on, partial, non stuff is psion guild theory. Many people have their doubts about this sort of classification due to a lack of empirical evidence, though, I do believe that everyone can agree that some develop a proficiency in psionics naturally, while the majority have to do so through diligent practice.



ya thats definitely where i got it granted. let me explain my self first (i have noticed that this site sort of considers psion guild to be a taboo kind of thing), this past month i have had no interaction w/ psions, let alone w/ psions on the net, so i admit i'm a little naive on where i should get my info from. but i decided i would just check it out and formulate my own opinion. the only page i've actually looked at is the definition page.

there were concepts that i hadn't attached words to and some were interesting. i dont know what else they have on the site though. so if they have like fighting things im sorry for mentioning the site and i'll just stop talking about it.



oh and thanks for the add apollo


No need to get down on yourself about it. It's only natural that everyone goes to, and reads information from, different websites. I myself started at the psion guild and floated around cyberspace until I settled here at Psipog. Also, I'm not saying the theory is wrong, it just can't be validated via objective means. If you can't test it, you can't prove it, but you can't disprove it.
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 10:11 pm

Yamamaya

Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 292

i wonder how many people here are claiming but not telling...

wasn't born into this. dad's full blown against it so never discovered it till 3 years ago. still, it's hard to do stuff other than manipulate things around myself. however, empathy didn't take as long as i thought...
Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 11:40 pm

freakinrican626

Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 514

Roy wrote:
freakinrican626 wrote:
Roy wrote:
This born-on, partial, non stuff is psion guild theory. Many people have their doubts about this sort of classification due to a lack of empirical evidence, though, I do believe that everyone can agree that some develop a proficiency in psionics naturally, while the majority have to do so through diligent practice.



ya thats definitely where i got it granted. let me explain my self first (i have noticed that this site sort of considers psion guild to be a taboo kind of thing), this past month i have had no interaction w/ psions, let alone w/ psions on the net, so i admit i'm a little naive on where i should get my info from. but i decided i would just check it out and formulate my own opinion. the only page i've actually looked at is the definition page.

there were concepts that i hadn't attached words to and some were interesting. i dont know what else they have on the site though. so if they have like fighting things im sorry for mentioning the site and i'll just stop talking about it.



oh and thanks for the add apollo


No need to get down on yourself about it. It's only natural that everyone goes to, and reads information from, different websites. I myself started at the psion guild and floated around cyberspace until I settled here at Psipog. Also, I'm not saying the theory is wrong, it just can't be validated via objective means. If you can't test it, you can't prove it, but you can't disprove it.


well then what's the deal w/ psion guild? it didn't seem like a bad site. i checked it out a little more. went through the education and research sections. didnt seem like a bad site
Back to top

Goto page 1, 2  Next

PsiPog.net Forum Index » General Discussion » born psi?