PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted | |
Author | Message |
---|---|
Posted on Thu Jan 26, 2006 8:44 am | |
Apollo
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 |
ummm, good for you? |
Back to top | |
Posted on Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:26 am | |
AeroWing
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 |
What about Aero/Air-PK? |
Back to top | |
Posted on Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:32 am | |
Peebrain
Site Admin |
That would be weather manipulation.
~Sean |
Back to top | |
Posted on Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:24 am | |
AeroWing
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 |
Yeah, that sounds about right, but I prefer the term Aero-PK, could I use that? it is, after all, more specific.
Also, would Chrono-PK be acceptible as Chrono-TP? as it is altering a person's perception of time, therefore it is more of a sub-skill of Telepathy rather than Psychokinesis. Hope I made that clear. |
Back to top | |
Posted on Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:22 am | |
Peebrain
Site Admin |
We prefer weather manipulation.
"Chrono-PK" ... is more of a time distortion... time dilation? If someone has some evidence or experience that they think would fall under "Chrono-PK" (not a fictional story, real actual experience), then it would probably be easier to label. Just don't create a new term - spell out exactly what you want to accomplish without relying on the term. ~Sean |
Back to top | |
Posted on Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:27 pm | |
Apollo
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 |
So if I wanted to create a thread that has 100% personal experience and a technique, what would I call it? (in your opinion what would I call it) |
Back to top | |
Posted on Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:05 pm | |
mattz1010
Joined: 14 Jan 2006 |
Well, if it was something new, it'd be a special case.
Otherwise, just explain what you did to get it, and what effects it had, that's like describing 'Aero-PK', aka weather control. |
Back to top | |
Posted on Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:42 pm | |
powersofall
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 |
Hey, why not just poll and see what would be good acceptable terms for the whole community?
That way everyone could give their opinion on matters and they could be viewed in a good fair way. Everybody has a say and everyone knows what is acceptable. just a thought |
Back to top | |
Posted on Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:53 pm | |
dragonwing4d
Joined: 03 Mar 2006 |
i have a question
we have a term for controlling matter(the stuff with mass and volume) called PK but controlling energy(volume no mass) is just sub sections to PK like pyrokinesis (fire takes up space but has no mass) shouldent we have a term for controlling energy? |
Back to top | |
Posted on Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:18 pm | |
Eldibs
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 |
Pyrokinesis isn't controlling fire, it's psychokinetically generating heat. Heat is what you get when atoms (or molecules) vibrate. You use psychokinesis to cause the atoms to vibrate, generating heat.
Therefore, Pyrokinesis = Psychokinesis |
Back to top | |
Posted on Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:10 pm | |
wateryheart
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 |
Okay I know there are alot of kinesises floating around out there that just basically fall under PK right but can't you still specify them indivudally like Hydrokinesis, it only focuses on water and the movement of it not the creation of it. It is a form of PK and so are many others but it isnt completly wrong it you do indivudally specify them, is it?
~*ShAdY SkY*~ |
Back to top | |
Posted on Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:51 pm | |
powersofall
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 |
Why on earth be so picky??? this is more frustrating than any term anyone could create. ![]() I propose this thread be lock so there isn't anymore of this crap about what term is alowed. Let people have the freedom to call things what they want. ![]() I say put a profanity block...if anyone uses it their reply/thread should be taken out. Thank you and I hope some agree. |
Back to top | |
Posted on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:52 pm | |
Apollo
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 |
I agree. I think things such as pyrokinesis, cryokinesis (i know, i know it is the opposite of pyro), and some others (not insane like hydro/aqua whatever) should be allowed. A thread got LOCKED because it talked about chronokinesis (the ability to alter ones perception of time) because of this thread even though people still think it is NOT a kinesis and was misnamed (like the battle of Bunker Hill). I see no point in this because it is a conversation about a misnamed "kinesis". It is just a hassle on the moderator's part. Yeah, it will get crazy with "hydrokinesis and aquakinesis" and whatever else there is but just allow a few words. It gets really annoying. Another thread got locked because he asked a question about "electrokinesis". In fact, 2 threads got locked by different people. Another thread got locked looking for "people who have mastered fire manipulation". He didnt say pyrokinesis. Yeah, sure some noob comes still thinking that people can master abilities. You can easily and KINDLY (in caps because I am to lazy to italicize) set him straight and not completely block his learning. One topic got locked by saying "chrono-pk". Getting better, no? He showed that he knew it was a pk but he wanted specific help. Just go throught the 4 pages of threads and see what was locked due to "bad words". One was locked on "gravity". Yeah, sure lock that one! That was crap. There are a couple others but, yeah you get my point... |
Back to top | |
Posted on Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:17 am | |
Gonzo
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 |
I agree with you Chris, its useless locking all those post just because they use a word to make clear what they mean.
get a poll up or something for Good/bad words and make a list of acceptable terms. Just PK, is not usually enough information to describe what you mean, yeah you could say psychokinetically generating heat, but then its still easier to say pyrokinesis, or just any other term, a lot more people understand the term electrokinesis than "manipulating psi to behave like electricity". 1- or get a poll up for "to use and not to use" 2- or accept those terms and don't lock everything just because they call it ...kinesis |
Back to top | |
Posted on Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:30 pm | |
WhiteRaven
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 |
but there need to be some limitations, things such as "pyrokinesis" should stay because it is less stupid than say... "geokinesis" if you can move a coin, you can move an amount of dirt equal to the coins weight, so it's really the same, pyro, however, is on a molecular scale and therefore quite different from moving coins and dirt. |
Back to top |
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
PsiPog.net Forum Index » Psychokinesis » Valid -Kinesis Terms! Read or your messages might be deleted
All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.